cassidyrose: (yellow sunflower in garden)
[personal profile] cassidyrose
Photo of the day for today: Calm. Another from Joe Decker's Tidepool and Trails workshop last December. I went in a different direction with this one than I typically would with the processing and while I am unsure about it I keep coming back to it and I like it, so it makes the cut

Calm

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-14 06:54 pm (UTC)
zahraa: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zahraa
It looks really interesting, but it also looks a little overprocessed. Maybe I wouldn't think that if I didn't know what the light was really like that day, but the end result bears little color resemblance to what I know you must have started with. It's almost like the puddles in the lower left look too bright next to the rocks. And the moss looks really GREEN.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-14 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cassidyrose.livejournal.com
It is actually pretty close to the original in terms of color. I bumped the vibrance and saturation a bit, and the colors now are less dull, but they are not vastly different, at least in my estimation. I left the brightness alone and took down the lights and highlights, so the puddles are pretty much the same as the original, and are certainly not brighter. I realize I forgot to work with the white balance and that may be what is giving it a bit of an "off" sense.

It was a long exposure shot and looked a bit surreal and odd to begin with so I went with it and added negative clarity. Perhaps that is what you are reacting to in terms of the processing? As far as the moss, that may certainly be a monitor variation as it just looks like green moss on my machine, but it certainly may look greener on other machines and my monitor is not calibrated (Something I really need to do). I would have to print it to know if the moss was actually too green with what I did with it, but the greens and yellows were there as shot, I just made them a bit more saturated and a bit brighter.

I am on the fence about the photo myself. I definitely took it to a place a bit more outside the realism of a lot what I do, but that was intentional. Still not sure I love it, but I do like it. I may need to work with it more.

Thanks for the feedback! I appreciate it.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-14 08:55 pm (UTC)
zahraa: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zahraa
Interesting. Maybe it's the saturation. Maybe I need to work more with longer exposures (that annoying tripod thing again) and get used to how they look. Maybe now that [personal profile] zyxwvut is working consistently, I could get a better tripod. (How is [personal profile] ptor's situation in that regard?)

How do you calibrate a monitor?

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-14 09:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cassidyrose.livejournal.com
Yeah, I find that people who do long-exposure really, really well are often able to make the photos look other-worldly without really looking over-processed. It may indeed be the saturation you are responding to, and like I said, it may look *way* more saturated to you on your screen than me on mine. You calibrate with a tool and color card, I do believe...I will try to find a link to it...it was explained in my Lightroom book.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-15 04:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metaphortunate.livejournal.com
I like it! It looks like a landscape on imaginary Mars.

Profile

cassidyrose: (Default)
cassidyrose

April 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718 19 20212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags